Endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy in patients with complete pancreas divisum and acute recurrent pancreatitis: a metanalysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreas divisum (PD) is a congenital variant of the pancreatic ductal system and a potential cause of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP). Endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy (MiES) is the most common procedure performed in the management of PD-related ARP. The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis estimating the efficacy and the safety of MiES in the management of patients with PD-related ARP. METHODS: A research was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of science, the studies were reviewed and selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Evaluation of Heterogeneity and publication bias was performed, and a random effect model was used to estimate the effect size of each study. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen articles were selected and reviewed, 13 met the inclusion criteria. All the studies were retrospective with a mean follow-up duration of 45.9 months. A total of 323 patients with PD-related ARP treated with MiES were included in the meta-analysis. The overall clinical success rate of MiES (defined as no further episodes of ARP, reduction of episodes of ARP, or improvement in quality of life) was of 77% (95%CI: 72%-81%; p = 0.30). Evaluating only the studies with clinical success rate defined as "no further AP in the follow-up" the clinical success rate was of 69.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-77.2%; p = 0.57), while evaluating the studies with other definitions (reduction of episodes of ARP or improvement in quality of life) the clinical success rate was of 81.2% (95%CI: 75.2%-86.1%; p = 0.45). The common fixed effects model disclosed a 25.5% overall adverse events rate (95%CI: 19.3%-32.8%; p = 0.42): acute pancreatitis in 14.3% (95%CI: 9.7%-20.6%; p = 0.36), bleeding in 5.6% (95%CI: 2.9%-10.4%; p = 0.98), and other adverse events in 5.6% (95%CI: 2.9%-10.4%; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MiES is an effective and relatively safe treatment in the management of PD-related ARP. The retrospective nature of the studies selected is the main limitations of this metanalysis. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.

Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy in patients with IPMN-related recurrent pancreatitis: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) is a rare manifestation of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas; ARP is a relative indication for pancreatic surgery in the setting of IPMN. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPS) has been described as a minimal invasive treatment to reduce the episodes of ARP secondary to mucus migration in IPMN. METHODS: patients with IPMN-related ARP treated with ESP from January 2004 to December 2020 were retrospectively selected. Clinical and technical data were recorded. A clinical follow-up (minimum 12 months) was performed to assess the number of episodes of AP occurring after EPS. RESULTS: 25 patients were included. The mean follow-up after ESP was 93.4 months (SD± 56.6). The mean number of AP before and after EPS were respectively 3.29 (SD ± 1.04) and 0.51 (SD ± 0.71). A complete response (no further episodes of AP) and a partial response (>50% reduction of AP episodes) were obtained in 64% and 24% of the cases, respectively, with an overall response rate of 88%. One post-EPS bleeding and one minor-papilla stenosis were reported and were endoscopically managed. Two patients underwent pancreatic resection for the occurrence of high-risk stigmata for cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: EPS is a safe and effective treatment to reduce the number of episodes of AP in selected patients with IPMNs-related ARP. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.

Comparing the COVID-19-related PTSD symptoms between psychiatric patients and healthy subjects: an observational retrospective study from Northern Italy.

COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on mental health, both in the general population and psychiatric patients. Little is known about the difference between these two populations in perceiving the pandemic as a traumatic event. The aim of the study was to compare psychiatric patients and healthy controls (HC) in terms of change over time of post-traumatic (PTSD) symptoms. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) scores were registered at T1 as lockdown period (March-April 2020) and T2 as restarting (May-June 2020). Descriptive analyses and linear regression models were performed. A total of 166 outpatients and 57 HC were recruited. Time (F = 15.76; p < 0.001) and diagnosis (F = 4.94; p < 0.001) had a significant effect on the change of IES-R scores, which resulted T1 > T2 (p < 0.001), except for subjects affected by Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Overall, IES-R scores were < in patients than in HC (p = 0.02), particularly in the schizophrenia (SKZ) subgroup (p < 0.001). IES-R scores of subjects with personality disorders (PDs) resulted to be > HC, although not statistically significant. The lockdown period was perceived as more traumatic than the reopening phase by both groups, with the exception of OCD patients, probably because of the clinical worsening associated with the urge of control against risks of contamination. Overall, HC reported more PTSD symptoms than psychiatric patients did, particularly SKZ ones. PD patients, in contrast, may be more vulnerable to PTSD symptoms probably as a result of poor coping skills. Together with OCD patients, subjects with PDs may need closer monitoring during the different phases of the pandemic. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04694482.

Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis in pediatric population: Long-term efficacy and safety.

Background: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) in children is an inreasingly recognized disease. Objective: The purpose of study was to analyse the safety and long-term efficacy of endoscopic treatment in children with CP. Methods: Records of 38 patients aged <18 years, referred to the Digestive Endoscopy Unit at Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS between 1991 and 2017, were reviewed. Abdominal pain, analgesia and number of episodes of acute pancreatitis in the pre- and post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) period were evaluated. Need for surgery was assessed. Therapeutic intervention data and complications were interrogated. Results: In total 158 ERCPs were performed. Median post-ERCP follow-up was 7 years. The majority of patients had CP type IV (47%) and type Ib (37%) (Cremer's classification). Major papilla pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed in 47%, major and minor in 24% and minor in 29% of patients. Stones/plugs were removed in at least one ERCPs in 66% individuals. Eleven out of 38 patients had stricture of the pancreatic duct; these were dilated and stented in 5/11 and stented in 6/11. Five complications were recorded (3%). Severity and frequency of abdominal pain improved significantly; p < 0.001. Use of analgesia and number of episodes of acute pancreatitis decreased significantly; p < 0.001. One child required subsequent surgery. Conclusion: Endoscopic management of symptomatic CP in children is safe and effective.

Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It provides practical advice on how to achieve successful cannulation and sphincterotomy at minimum risk to the patient. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations 1 ESGE suggests that difficult biliary cannulation is defined by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla whilst attempting to cannulate; more than 5 minutes spent attempting to cannulate following visualization of the papilla; more than one unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). 2 ESGE recommends the guidewire-assisted technique for primary biliary cannulation, since it reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). 3 ESGE recommends using pancreatic guidewire (PGW)-assisted biliary cannulation in patients where biliary cannulation is difficult and repeated unintentional access to the main pancreatic duct occurs (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). ESGE recommends attempting prophylactic pancreatic stenting in all patients with PGW-assisted attempts at biliary cannulation (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). 4 ESGE recommends needle-knife fistulotomy as the preferred technique for precutting (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). ESGE suggests that precutting should be used only by endoscopists who achieve selective biliary cannulation in more than 80 % of cases using standard cannulation techniques (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). When access to the pancreatic duct is easy to obtain, ESGE suggests placement of a pancreatic stent prior to precutting (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation). 5 ESGE recommends that in patients with a small papilla that is difficult to cannulate, transpancreatic biliary sphincterotomy should be considered if unintentional insertion of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct occurs (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation).In patients who have had transpancreatic sphincterotomy, ESGE suggests prophylactic pancreatic stenting (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). 6 ESGE recommends that mixed current is used for sphincterotomy rather than pure cut current alone, as there is a decreased risk of mild bleeding with the former (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). 7 ESGE suggests endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) as an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for extracting CBD stones < 8 mm in patients without anatomical or clinical contraindications, especially in the presence of coagulopathy or altered anatomy (moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation). 8 ESGE does not recommend routine biliary sphincterotomy for patients undergoing pancreatic sphincterotomy, and suggests that it is reserved for patients in whom there is evidence of coexisting bile duct obstruction or biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation). 9 In patients with periampullary diverticulum (PAD) and difficult cannulation, ESGE suggests that pancreatic duct stent placement followed by precut sphincterotomy or needle-knife fistulotomy are suitable options to achieve cannulation (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).ESGE suggests that EST is safe in patients with PAD. In cases where EST is technically difficult to complete as a result of a PAD, large stone removal can be facilitated by a small EST combined with EPBD or use of EPBD alone (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). 10 For cannulation of the minor papilla, ESGE suggests using wire-guided cannulation, with or without contrast, and sphincterotomy with a pull-type sphincterotome or a needle-knife over a plastic stent (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).When cannulation of the minor papilla is difficult, ESGE suggests secretin injection, which can be preceded by methylene blue spray in the duodenum (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). 11 In patients with choledocholithiasis who are scheduled for elective cholecystectomy, ESGE suggests intraoperative ERCP with laparoendoscopic rendezvous (moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation). ESGE suggests that when biliary cannulation is unsuccessful with a standard retrograde approach, anterograde guidewire insertion either by a percutaneous or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided approach can be used to achieve biliary access (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). 12 ESGE suggests that in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy ERCP should be performed in referral centers, with the side-viewing endoscope as a first option; forward-viewing endoscopes are the second choice in cases of failure (low quality evidence, weak recommendation). A straight standard ERCP catheter or an inverted sphincterotome, with or without the guidewire, is recommended by ESGE for biliopancreatic cannulation in patients who have undergone Billroth II gastrectomy (low quality evidence, strong recommendation). Endoscopic papillary ballon dilation (EPBD) is suggested as an alternative to sphincterotomy for stone extraction in the setting of patients with Billroth II gastrectomy (low quality evidence, weak recommendation).In patients with complex post-surgical anatomy ESGE suggests referral to a center where device-assisted enteroscopy techniques are available (very low quality evidence, weak recommendation).

Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clarification of the position of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) regarding the interventional options available for treating patients with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Systematic literature search to answer explicit key questions with levels of evidence serving to determine recommendation grades. The ESGE funded development of the Guideline. SUMMARY OF SELECTED RECOMMENDATIONS: For treating painful uncomplicated chronic pancreatitis, the ESGE recommends extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the first-line interventional option. The clinical response should be evaluated at 6 - 8 weeks; if it appears unsatisfactory, the patient's case should be discussed again in a multidisciplinary team. Surgical options should be considered, in particular in patients with a predicted poor outcome following endoscopic therapy (Recommendation grade B). For treating chronic pancreatitis associated with radiopaque stones ≥ 5 mm that obstruct the main pancreatic duct, the ESGE recommends extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as a first step, combined or not with endoscopic extraction of stone fragments depending on the expertise of the center (Recommendation grade B). For treating chronic pancreatitis associated with a dominant stricture of the main pancreatic duct, the ESGE recommends inserting a single 10-Fr plastic stent, with stent exchange planned within 1 year (Recommendation grade C). In patients with ductal strictures persisting after 12 months of single plastic stenting, the ESGE recommends that available options (e. g., endoscopic placement of multiple pancreatic stents, surgery) be discussed in a multidisciplinary team (Recommendation grade D).For treating uncomplicated chronic pancreatic pseudocysts that are within endoscopic reach, the ESGE recommends endoscopic drainage as a first-line therapy (Recommendation grade A).For treating chronic pancreatitis-related biliary strictures, the choice between endoscopic and surgical therapy should rely on local expertise, patient co-morbidities and expected patient compliance with repeat endoscopic procedures (Recommendation grade D). If endoscopy is elected, the ESGE recommends temporary placement of multiple, side-by-side, plastic biliary stents (Recommendation grade A).

Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline.

This article is part of a combined publication that expresses the current view of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy about endoscopic biliary stenting. The present Clinical Guideline describes short-term and long-term results of biliary stenting depending on indications and stent models; it makes recommendations on when, how, and with which stent to perform biliary drainage in most common clinical settings, including in patients with a potentially resectable malignant biliary obstruction and in those who require palliative drainage of common bile duct or hilar strictures. Treatment of benign conditions (strictures related to chronic pancreatitis, liver transplantation, or cholecystectomy, and leaks and failed biliary stone extraction) and management of complications (including stent revision) are also discussed. A two-page executive summary of evidence statements and recommendations is provided. A separate Technology Review describes the models of biliary stents available and the stenting techniques, including advanced techniques such as insertion of multiple plastic stents, drainage of hilar strictures, retrieval of migrated stents and combined stenting in malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions.The target readership for the Clinical Guideline mostly includes digestive endoscopists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, radiologists, internists, and surgeons while the Technology Review should be most useful to endoscopists who perform biliary drainage.

A new partially covered nitinol stent for palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction: a multicenter single-arm prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have proven effective for managing malignant bile duct strictures and may reduce risk of tumor ingrowth. A new nitinol partially covered biliary SEMS was prospectively evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 70 patients with inoperable extrahepatic biliary obstructions were enrolled in a prospective multicenter trial, and followed up to 6 months or death, whichever came first. Primary endpoint was adequate palliation defined as absence of recurrent biliary obstruction from partly covered SEMS placement to end of follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 69 years and 52 % were men. Pancreatic carcinoma was present in 68 %. One stent was placed in 67 patients, two patients received two, and in one patient a guide wire could not traverse the stricture. In 55 % of patients the SEMS was inserted de novo and in 45 % for exchange with a plastic stent. Technical success was 97 %. At 6 months, 62 % of patients were free of obstructive symptoms; compared with baseline the mean number of symptoms per patient was significantly reduced (3.1 at baseline, 0.6 at 6 months; P < 0.0001) and total bilirubin levels dropped by 73 %. There were four cases of recurrent biliary obstruction, due to stent migration (2), tumor overgrowth (1), and sludge formation (1). Device-related complications included cholecystitis (3), right upper quadrant pain (1), and moderate pancreatitis (1). No tumor ingrowth was reported. CONCLUSIONS: This new partially covered nitinol SEMS is easily inserted, and safe and effective in the palliation of biliary obstruction secondary to malignant bile duct strictures.

Endoscopic hemostasis with fibrin glue for refractory postsphincterotomy and postpapillectomy bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a feared complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy and papillectomy. Fibrin glue has been proposed as an effective adjunct in securing hemostasis. However, its use has been limited by the risk of early occlusion of the injecting needle, and its role has not been defined in the setting of refractory post-ERCP bleeding. We present a modified technique of endoscopic hemostasis with diluted fibrin glue in the setting of postsphincterotomy and postpapillectomy bleeds. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to verify that diluted fibrin glue can be easily and successfully injected and is effective in the endoscopic treatment of refractory post-ERCP bleeding. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: A tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Six patients with refractory post-ERCP bleeding were treated (3 after sphincterotomy and 3 after papillectomy) with fibrin glue injection. INTERVENTION: Endoscopic hemostasis with diluted fibrin glue injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Successful endoscopic hemostasis with diluted fibrin glue injection. RESULTS: One session of fibrin glue injection stopped the refractory post-ERCP bleeding in all 6 patients. LIMITATION: Small number of patients. CONCLUSION: This case series provides evidence that our modified injection technique of diluted fibrin glue allowed an easy submucosal injection and may be considered to be an effective endoscopic modality to treat refractory post-ERCP bleeding.

Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: technical and clinical results.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for acute cholecystitis while percutaneous drainage is reserved for high-risk patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the technical success rate and clinical efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 35 consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis and without residual common bile duct obstruction were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified according to the pathogenesis and stages of acute cholecystitis, and the morphology of the cystic duct and/or its insertion in the common bile duct. Primary outcomes were technical success and early and late clinical success. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed within the first 72 hours in 19 patients (54%). Technical success was achieved in 29 patients (83%); drainage was nasocholecystic in 21 of these (72%), plastic stenting in 6 (21%), and a combined method in 2 (7%). The pathogenesis and stage of acute cholecystitis, and the morphology both of the cystic duct and its insertion in the common bile duct, did not influence technical success. Clinical success was achieved in 24 cases (83%) after a median of 3 days (range 2-12). Four patients (14%) died within 3 days due to septic complications, and one accidentally removed the nasocholecystic drain after 24 hours. Late results, available in 21 patients after a median follow-up of 17 months, showed relapse of acute cholecystitis in 2 (10%) (both with stents) and of biliary pain in 2 patients (10%), both of whom had nasocholecystic drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic gallbladder drainage seems feasible and effective in resolving acute cholecystitis, but only as a temporary measure because of a 20% relapse rate in long-term follow-up. Prospective studies are necessary to identify which patients would benefit most from this endoscopic technique in the short and long term.

[Tolerability of oral administration of carboxymethylcellulose in two patients presenting anaphylactic reaction after carboxymethylcellulose injection]. / Tolérance de la carboxyméthylcellulose par voie orale chez deux malades ayant développé une anaphylaxie à la carboxyméthylcellulose injectable.

BACKGROUND: Carboxymethylcellulose is a high-molecular-weight polysaccharide molecule used as a binding agent, for coating molecules and to increase the viscosity of formulations. It is present in a large number of pharmaceutical products but is also found in food and cosmetics. CASE-REPORT: We report two cases of patients who presented anaphylactic reactions immediately after localised corticosteroid injections; intra-articular for the first and intralesional for the second. Allergological testing for different corticosteroids and carboxymethylcellulose by means of prick-tests and intradermal testing indicated that the immediate hypersensitivity reaction was caused by the excipient, carboxymethylcellulose. The excellent safety of oral reintroduction of carboxymethylcellulose in a pharmaceutical preparation in these two patients confirmed that this large molecule is not absorbed through the digestive system. DISCUSSION: The avoidance list of products containing carboxymethylcellulose could be greatly reduced and limited to only injectable pharmaceutical preparations containing carboxymethylcellulose and to oral contrast media containing large quantities of carboxymethylcellulose.

No difference between supine and prone position for ERCP in conscious sedated patients: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is usually performed with the patient prone or in the left lateral position. The supine position could be more comfortable and may facilitate airway management. On the other hand, technical difficulties and a greater risk of adverse cardiorespiratory events have been shown when ERCP is performed in a supine patient. Our aim was to assess, in a tertiary referral center, the differences between performing ERCP with the patient supine or prone, in terms of technical features and complications both during and after the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2005 and May 2006, 120 patients (66 female, mean age 62 years) who had an intact papilla and were candidates for therapeutic ERCP were prospectively randomized to undergo ERCP under conscious sedation with midazolam, in the prone (n = 60) or supine (n = 60) position, by an expert endoscopist (tutor) or a trainee. The following parameters were recorded: difficulty of cannulation and difficulty of ECRP procedure, time needed to visualize the papilla, time needed to achieve opacification and cannulation, exam duration, episodes of tachy/bradycardia and desaturation, episodes of duodenoscope displacement into the stomach, and complications. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent ERCP for benign disease and 22 for malignant biliary strictures. The ERCP success rate was 98.3 % in the tutor group and 43.3 % in the trainee group. No significant differences were found between the two groups of operators (tutors and trainees) in the recorded parameters and complication rates encountered in prone versus supine patients. CONCLUSION: Our results show that ERCP success rates and complications (intraoperative and postoperative) are similar whether ERCP is performed with the patient prone or supine, even when operators are of differing skill levels. Training, technique, and a proper learning phase are recommended in order to perform ERCP with no differences whether the patient is prone or supine.

Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are an effective palliative treatment for malignant biliary and duodenal strictures. Combined biliary and duodenal stenting remains a technical challenge, however. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of an endoscopic approach to double stenting of malignant biliary and duodenal strictures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for palliative gastroduodenal and biliary stenting were followed up prospectively. Patients' demographic characteristics, the site and nature of the strictures, success rates, complications, and survival time were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients underwent double stenting. In 46 patients, biliary obstruction occurred before the onset of duodenal obstruction (by a median of 107 days) (group 1); in 14 patients, biliary obstruction occurred concurrently with duodenal obstruction (group 2); and in four patients the duodenal obstruction preceded the biliary obstruction (by a median of 121 days) (group 3). The duodenal strictures were proximal to the papilla in 31 patients, adjacent to the papilla in 25 patients and distal to the papilla in eight patients. The majority of biliary strictures were in the middle or distal third of the bile duct (in 52/64 patients). Duodenal SEMS were successfully deployed in all patients. Combined endoscopic stenting was successful in 100% of patients in group 1, 86% of patients in group 2, and in 100% of patients in group 3. Taking the three groups together, early complications occurred in 6% of patients and late complications occurred in 16% of patients. The overall median survival after combined stenting was 81 days (range 2-447 days). CONCLUSIONS: Combined endoscopic biliary and duodenal SEMS insertion is safe and effective for palliation in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Biliary stenting through the mesh of the duodenal SEMS is technically feasible and has a high success rate.

Flexible endoscopic Zenker's diverticulotomy: cap-assisted technique vs. diverticuloscope-assisted technique.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The standard treatment for a Zenker's diverticulum is diverticulotomy, either using the endostapling approach or by surgery. Flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy has similar efficacy and is associated with fewer complications but this technique is still under investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the technical results and efficacy of two flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients with a Zenker's diverticulum were treated using either cap or diverticuloscope assistance to expose the septum, which was then cut with a needle-knife and endocut currents. The severity of symptoms was graded according to their frequencies before the procedure, after 1 month, and to June 2006. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients enrolled into the study, 28 patients were treated with the cap and 11 with the diverticuloscope, the two groups showing no statistical difference in baseline features. The median length of the Zenker's diverticulum was 4 cm (range 2-8 cm). The procedure time was significantly longer with the cap than with diverticuloscope assistance (P = 0.002). Complications occurred in 9/28 patients in the cap group and in none of the patients in the diverticuloscope group (P = 0.04); the perforations that occurred in five patients (18%) were managed endoscopically and conservatively. The median inpatient stay was 3 days (range 2-8 days). The clinical remission rate, evaluated using a pool of symptoms, was significantly higher after the diverticuloscope-assisted procedure compared with the cap technique (82% vs. 29%, P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that the diverticuloscope-assisted technique was the only significant prognostic factor for efficacy (odds ratio 13.09, 95% CI 2.07-82.53). CONCLUSION: The use of the soft diverticuloscope to expose and fix the septum seems to be the optimal approach in terms of increasing the safety and clinical efficacy of flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy.

Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transnasal placement of the Medtronic Bravo capsule for wireless esophageal pH monitoring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal manometry. The Bravo capsule was then introduced transnasally and released 5 cm above the upper margin of the lower esophageal sphincter. Serial radiographs were performed weekly until capsule release. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients who were evaluated, 38 (95 %) were eligible to undergo the procedure. Transnasal placement proved impossible in one patient (2.5 %). Overall, a total of 39 procedures were performed in 38 patients (the procedure was repeated in one patient because of accidental intragastric fixation). Esophageal placement was successful in 36/39 procedures (92.3 %). The mean duration of the procedure was 10 minutes (range 5 - 16 minutes). Adverse events were noted in five of the 39 procedures (12.8 %), mild epistaxis in two patients (5.1 %) and pharyngeal irritation in three patients (7.7 %). After the procedure, a slight "foreign body" sensation was reported by 20 of the 36 patients (55.5 %) who had undergone successful esophageal placement; two patients (5.5 %) experienced severe retrosternal pain necessitating endoscopic removal of the capsule. At the end of the study, 34 of the 38 patients (89.5 %) stated that they would be willing to undergo the test again if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal placement of the Bravo pH capsule is safe, well tolerated, does not require sedation, and avoids endoscopy and its complications.